Several times this debate has happened, if I have a right to
live, why I don't have a right to die. Different religions, creeds, countries
and people have their own views and laws for a good life and a good death too.
Now, for me, nothing is right and nothing is wrong, as far as a personal
conscious allows. I got the encouragement and patience to write on this topic
because of one recent death, Robert W. Wilson, 87 years old wall street tycoon,
who ended his life by jumping from 16th floor from the building he was residing.
To be honest, I didn't know him before this news. Even, I am not sure if anyone
from you who read this posting or people in my group, are concerned about wall
street and business/money tycoons. However, when I came through this news that
he ended his life from his San Remo apartment building, one prestigious and
reputed address in New York’s Upper East Side (although, address has nothing to
do with anyone's death), the line for me was what he said "I don't want to
suffer", in which he tried to explain his thoughts and feelings towards
life and about the suffering.
To cover a bit of story, he suffered from a stroke in June
2013, and some news confirms that he had another stroke recently in December
2013 too. Now personally for me, it was his choice as it was his life and he
had a right on it, it may be not a right thing by law. But this bigger question
is not if he did the right thing or wrong, it's what the message we got from
him. What he might be thinking, feeling before committing this act?
Sometimes I have to visit hospitals, a few in my city. I see
patients, and not being a doctor, I feel utter pain. I am not saying that
doctors don't feel pain, they do, they are humans, however, they see this
everyday and are more habitual than us with the patients and diseases. They do
operations, treat people, we don't. They know in and out of a body, we don't.
So, when I see patients with chronic diseases, like renal failure, liver
failure, people with never ending and painful clinical procedures, I hear the
voices. I hear from their own senses that they want to end this. They lived and
now they are liability, on their families, on themselves. Its obvious for them
to say that! One who feels the pain, knows the pain. We can only try to
explain.
My first line before I go ahead: "I am not against
Science and technology".
The more we are growing in the field of science and
technology, more we are moving towards suffering and pain, isn't it? Yes, we
have found the cure for many things, but isn't it the more diseases we have
created/invented? Isn't it the world is becoming to be a more suffering palace?
We had a body which was gifted and earlier, we were returning it back more or
less in the same state. No doubt we save a lot of people now a days, no doubt
we have been successful to place one person's organ into another one's,
however, isn't it obvious that we gained the quantity of life, but at the cost
of quality?
I am sure few people will agree to the fact that both cure
and diseases are by-product of science only. I was going through a recent study
where pregnant women are being advised to avoid plastics used in cling wrap,
shampoo and computer cables, after a link has been found between premature
birth and chemicals known as phthalates. Now plastic is a product of science
and the study of prevention from premature birth is also a product from
science. Its a relative theory based on create virus first for the use of
antivirus. Yes, we made our life easy by using the products from technology,
but at what cost? Isn't it easy life is at the cost of quality of life? There
are many research and studies filled with how we are becoming our own enemy, by
inventing and using the new chemicals, and then finding cure for the diseases
which comes in existence by those chemicals.
Back to the topic, a rightful death, after a rightful life.
Robert W. Wilson made his choice, not to suffer, not to become dependent on any
person or machine. Though he had good $100 million left in the end, after he
donated $700 million, he decided to act like this (he left a note to donate
$100 million too after his death, according to news). I can assume he had
enough amount of money with him to be on support, support by men and machines.
Now, including me, no-one can comment on whether he did right or wrong, esp.
when we exclude the laws and religion and keep those things out of scope!
So where we are heading? This might be not something new, a
suicide or an attempt of suicide, but the message he delivered is different and
new... "I don't want to suffer". Which implies, that if law and
religion will not allow a good death, someone will (a thought or a feeling
probably). Yes, I can speak from the side of people who talk about the sanctity
of life and a suicide or euthanasia is illegal, for the reason I am not to
decode or decide what is right and what is wrong. As I said, most of us are
confused between right and wrong and if we have to do something, we convince
ourselves for the same and on that moment, we act.
The big question left is, does the suffering end by ending
our life? Is that the end or a relief? What if not? What if the suffering adds
on by committing it? But yes, for the moment, it may be... end of suffering.
RIP Robert W. Wilson, wherever you are.
